360º ARCHITECTURE SERVICES

Comparative analysis of works budgets

Analysis and study of the budgets presented by the different companies based on the technical guidelines set by the trusted community technician.

Thanks to Comparative analysis, you will be able to combine all of the construction work costs and allow the community to choose an industrial business to carry out the work according to its scope, quality and projected cost.

Our goal is to determine the true requirements and the recommended solution in each case, to ensure that the customer can choose the best builder without affecting the quality and cost of the project. With Comparative Analysis, you’ll make the best decision.

Ask us for an non-binding quote.

Understand the regulations affecting your property.

Why choose SENSEDI

Our services are carried out with technology that lets us be transparent.
That way you can be sure that you always have all the information you need.

Prioritisation of community interests.

Consultancy services from technical experts.

Reliable technicians.

Comparative Estimate Analysis on quotes.

Definition of the scope of the project.

Quotes without complications.

Analysis of the community's financial resources.

Homogeneous budgets.

Advice for the hiring of industrial businesses.

Information is accessible and transparent.

Your savings are our strongest guarantee

30%

Save on the total cost of the work

12%

Save on drafting projects

100%

Expectations fulfilled

With the Comparative tool you will be able to:

Prioritise actions according to your financial resources.
Compare quotes from industrial businesses.
Select a professional without compromising quality.
Find out the total economic cost of the work.

Ask us for an non-binding quote.

Real case

Study comparison of refurbishment of façades

Compare and optimise your investment in the execution of the work.

During the process of refurbishment of the façades of a construction site in Santa Coloma, a comparative study was carried out.
The data extracted showed that not all the industrialists selected to carry out the work were proposing to use high-quality materials.

The cheapest company – the one initially preferred by the community – did not have the most suitable materials for the execution of the refurbishment. Had they gone ahead with this decision, the quality and durability of the work would have been compromised.

Thanks to the use of a comparative study, the community made the right decision, optimising its investment and guaranteeing the quality of its façade.